mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] get_request starvation fix
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 20:31:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020208193142Z291762-13996+19336@vger.kernel.org> (raw)

On Fri, Feb 08 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Here's a patch which addresses the get_request starvation problem.

[snip]

> Also, you noted the other day that a LILO run *never* terminated when
> there was a dbench running.  This is in fact not due to request
> starvation.  It's due to livelock in invalidate_bdev(), which is called
> via ioctl(BLKFLSBUF) by LILO.  invalidate_bdev() will never terminate
> as long as another task is generating locked buffers against the
> device.
[snip]

Could this below related?
I get system looks through lilo (bzlilo) from time to time with all latest 
kernels + O(1) + -aa + preempt

Thanks,
	Dieter

> Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -J9
> Datum: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:36:21 +0100
> Von: Dieter Nützel <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
> An: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Kopie: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
>
> On Wednesday, 30. January 2002 17:26, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 30. January 2002 15:40, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] Nützel wrote:
> > > > As always running "nice +19 make -j40" in my HUGE C++ VTK tree in the
> > > > background ;-)
> > > >
> > > > The mouse feels a little bit sluggish after KMail start so I reniced X
> > > > to -10. [...]
> > >
> > > does this make X smooth? nice -10 is a good choice, it's not too low and
> > > not too high, i'm using that value myself.
> >
> > Yes, mostly.
> > In "normal operation mode" X at 0 is good.
> >
> > I only get some very little but noticeable unsmoothness with several KDE
> > apps running. It could be KDE it self.
> >
> > Latency degradation since -J4 stays. But that could be missing of some
> > lock-breaks.
> >
> > Robert's latest BKL stuff halved the numbers for the two
> > latencytest0.42-png graphic benches on 2.4.18-pre7 + patches.

> Addition:

> I am most worried about the occasional kernel hangs during make 
> bzlilo/bzImage. It appears during lilo (???). The new kernel (vmlinux) is 
> still be built in /usr/src/linux but together with "latest" *.o and
> .*.flags files broken due to ReiserFS transaction replay after reboot
> (normal behavior with a journaling FS but without full data journaling.
>
> Maybe a RACE between lilo vs sync?

             reply	other threads:[~2002-02-08 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-08 19:31 Dieter Nützel [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-13 13:55 rwhron
2002-02-12 23:13 Andrew Morton
2002-02-13  1:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-02-15 17:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-02-16  7:32   ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-16 10:13     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-16 10:25       ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-09  1:56 rwhron
     [not found] <200202081932.GAA05943@mangalore.zipworld.com.au>
2002-02-08 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-08 19:53   ` Dieter Nützel
2002-02-08 20:43   ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-08  8:46 Andrew Morton
2002-02-08  8:57 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-08  9:57   ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-08  9:10 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-08 11:37 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-08 18:28   ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-11  9:41 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-11 17:35   ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-02-11 19:26     ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-14  6:00       ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-02-13  0:33   ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020208193142Z291762-13996+19336@vger.kernel.org \
    --to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®