mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
To: Olaf Zaplinski <olaf.zaplinski@web.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: iptables: why different behaviour with two kernel versions?
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:06:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020209100614.U26676@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C645047.C2C248B8@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <3C645047.C2C248B8@web.de>; from olaf.zaplinski@web.de on Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:25:11PM +0100

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:25:11PM +0100, Olaf Zaplinski wrote:
> Hi all,

Hi Olaf.

Please direct iptables usage questions to the netfilter@lists.samba.org
mailinglist (as stated in the MAINTAINERS file).

> my self made firewall at $HOME (iptables based) works fine, but the
> accounting data it reports every day is not as expected.
[...]

>From what you have written, I can draw the assumption that you think
forwarded packets go through INPUT or OUTPUT?  Then you're thinking in
2.2.x ipchains terms.

In 2.4.x (== iptables) firewalling, forwarded packets go only through 
output.

> So I built the 2.4.13 kernel to test that and got dozens of rejects in the
> logs, e.g. UDP connects to the DNS forwarders... so I could not test the
> accounting stuff. I switched back to 2.4.17 and everything was fine again.
> 
> So what's wrong with iptables-1.2.4 userland tools and 2.4.[13|17]? Why is
> iptables-rules@2.4.13 not the same as iptables-rules@2.4.17?

Maybe something else in your setup was different?  There is no difference
between the filter table in 2.4.13 and 2.4.17.

> Olaf

-- 
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org               http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+ 
V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)

      reply	other threads:[~2002-02-09  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-08 22:25 Olaf Zaplinski
2002-02-09  9:06 ` Harald Welte [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020209100614.U26676@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
    --to=laforge@gnumonks.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=olaf.zaplinski@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®