From: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org,
stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [SOLUTION] Re: Fw: 2.4.18-pre9: iptables screwed?
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:36:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020212083626.P11911@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020208105548.P26676@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020211130712.32755C-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020211130712.32755C-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>; from davidsen@tmr.com on Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 01:11:51PM -0500
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 01:11:51PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> What is the first thing anyone would do if they had a problem with
> iptables? Turn on debugging, obviously.
yes, I totally agree. I'm not arguing that the current behaviour is OK -
of course it should work with debugging enabled. All I said is that under
normal circumstances a production system is not supposed to have debugging
enabled.
> 2 - it really should work, debug should find errors, not cause them.
of course. That is why debugging does extra checks, which are disabled
in production use. Unfortunately we missed one check...
> 3 - Perhaps debug could be disabled but default, so instead of needing
> NDEBUG in production, you would use -DDEBUG when you had a problem
> (and it might even work ;-).
Yes, this is what I'm doing for the iptables-1.2.6 release. The current
-DNDEBUG stuff has historical reasons which are no longer valid.
> bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
--
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+
V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-12 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020208.010839.112626203.davem@redhat.com>
2002-02-08 9:55 ` Harald Welte
2002-02-08 10:12 ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-08 10:30 ` Harald Welte
2002-02-08 10:50 ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-11 18:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-02-12 7:36 ` Harald Welte [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020212083626.P11911@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
--to=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org \
--cc=stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®