mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan <alan@clueserver.org>
To: John Weber <john.weber@linuxhq.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.4 sound module problem
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:18:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202130752.g1D7qDL22868@clueserver.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.f4gi5iv.1ikenrc@ifi.uio.no> <fa.fo94urv.167g1q5@ifi.uio.no> <3C69F385.5050207@linuxhq.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C69F385.5050207@linuxhq.com>

On Tuesday 12 February 2002 21:03, John Weber wrote:
> Alan wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 February 2002 19:51, Albert Cranford wrote:
> >>Not sure if this was the same message I received. but here
> >>is the patch I used to get around my sound problem in
> >>2.5.4.
> >
> > Are you sure this is correct?  include/asm/io.h seems to indicate that
> > i/o addresses for PCI may not map correctly.  The sound card I am using
> > is PCI, not ISA.
>
> You should not use isa_virt_to_bus.  IIRC someone on this list worried
> about this exact thing happening.

Glad I checked before adding the patch... ]:>

> > Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt says that virt_to_bus is completly
> > depreciated and nothing should be using it.  Well, grepping the kernel
> > source shows that quite a bit still uses it.
>
> This is on the kernel janitor TODO, and we (janitors) will be tackling
> this shortly.  But your instinct is right, virt_to_bus shouldn't be
> everywhere.

IMHO 2.5.4 is pretty broken until that gets fixed.  the list is pretty long 
as well.

> > What it looks like, on first glance, is that virt_to_bus  was changed for
> > pci devices to give this error message.  (Since that symbol goes
> > nowhere.)  That effects a number of things, not just sound. (A whole
> > bunch of cardbus drivers I would guess...)
>
> This is correct.  It has been a policy to use pci_alloc_consistent
> instead of kmalloc/getfreepages and virt_to_bus, 2.5 is enforcing it now.

By breaking sound (in dmabuf and sound modules), cardbus (lots of places), 
and who knows what else.

"grep -r virt_to_bus | less" shows jut how bad it is going to be...

> It is boring work to change this in many drivers, but I don't know any
> better so I think it quite fun to go in and help :).  I'll start sending
> patches to the relevant maintainers shortly.

Thanks.

It just makes me wonder if anyone actually compiled this and ran it before it 
was released.

Back to 2.4.x land for a while i guess... (At least on this machine.)


  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-13  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.f4gi5iv.1ikenrc@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.fo94urv.167g1q5@ifi.uio.no>
2002-02-13  5:03   ` John Weber
2002-02-13  5:18     ` Alan [this message]
2002-02-13  9:21       ` Alan Cox
2002-02-13  7:46     ` Miles Lane
     [not found] <mailman.1013591941.29105.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-02-13 17:21 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-02-13  3:51 Albert Cranford
2002-02-13  3:10 ` Alan
2002-02-13  4:22 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-13  9:26   ` Alan Cox
2002-02-13  9:36   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12 18:52     ` Gérard Roudier
2002-02-13 10:24     ` Alan Cox
2002-02-13 18:59       ` Alan
2002-02-13 20:26       ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-13  2:22 Alan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200202130752.g1D7qDL22868@clueserver.org \
    --to=alan@clueserver.org \
    --cc=john.weber@linuxhq.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®