From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] queue barrier support
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:26:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202131826.g1DIQCT02506@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
axboe@suse.de said:
> ChangeSet@1.297, 2002-02-13 13:42:39+01:00, axboe@burns.home.kernel.dk
> Add support for SCSI drivers to indicate support for ordered tags
> http://bitmover.com:8888//tmp/v2_logging/athlon.transmeta.com/
> torvalds-2002020517305 \ 6-16047-c1d11a41ed024864/cset@1.133.114.4?nav=
> index.html|ChangeSet@-1h
> ChangeSet@1.298, 2002-02-13 13:43:04+01:00, axboe@burns.home.kernel.dk
> Add ordered tag support to the aic7xxx scsi driver
The rest of the aic7xxx code uses MSG_ORDERED_TASK rather than
MSG_ORDERED_Q_TAG. You have to scan through the headers to see that these are
#defined the same.
A problem (that is probably only an issue for older drives) is that while
technically the standard requires all 3 types of TAG to be supported if tag
queueing is, some drives really only have simple tag support in their
firmware, so you may need to add a blacklist for ordered tags on certain
drives.
A further issue is that you haven't added anything to the error recovery code
for this. If error recovery is activated for the device at the reset level,
all tags will be discarded by the device. The eh will retry the failing
command and then the other tagged commands will be re-issued from the
scsi_bottom_half_handler (assuming the low level device driver immediately
fails them with DID_RESET) in the order in which the low level driver failed
them. Thus you have potentially completely messed up the ordering when the
commands all get retried.
James Bottomley
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-13 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-13 18:26 James Bottomley [this message]
2002-02-15 9:02 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-15 15:15 ` James Bottomley
2002-02-15 16:28 ` Chris Mason
2002-02-15 16:51 ` James Bottomley
2002-02-15 17:17 ` Chris Mason
2002-02-15 17:48 ` James Bottomley
2002-02-15 22:30 ` Matthias Andree
2002-02-15 17:09 ` James Bottomley
2002-02-15 16:43 ` Mike Anderson
2002-02-15 13:41 ` Chris Mason
2002-02-16 10:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-16 15:02 ` James Bottomley
2002-02-25 20:55 ` 929-Emulex, ABTS Command Anamoly! Cindy Sweet
2002-02-25 21:02 ` arjan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-13 12:51 [PATCH] queue barrier support Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 13:09 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 13:13 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 14:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 14:51 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-13 15:18 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 17:47 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200202131826.g1DIQCT02506@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®