From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: "Paul G. Allen" <pgallen@randomlogic.com>
Cc: "Linux kernel developer's mailing list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:43:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020223164353.B1952@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C771D29.942A07C2@starband.net>, <3C771D29.942A07C2@starband.net> <20020223134053.4fbe25ed.gang_hu@soul.com.cn> <3C772EF4.DB49876F@zip.com.au> <3C775FEF.BDA0253C@randomlogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C775FEF.BDA0253C@randomlogic.com>; from pgallen@randomlogic.com on Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:27:21AM +0000
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:27:21AM +0000, Paul G. Allen wrote:
> Which compiler, of all of the different versions, generates the most
> stable and fastest code. Compile speed and kernel size is not NEARLY as
> important as performance. So, which compiler fits the bill?
GCC 3.1, is what I'm told. 3.x has the infrastructure to do more optimizing,
but doesn't do all of it yet. 3.1 is supposed to.
Regards,
bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.tk the dot in .tk
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available -
Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control: http://ds9a.nl/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-23 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-23 4:40 Justin Piszcz
2002-02-23 4:44 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-23 5:13 ` Justin Piszcz
2002-02-23 5:22 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 10:31 ` Benny Sjostrand
2002-02-23 15:00 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-25 8:07 ` Simon Kirby
2002-02-25 8:32 ` David Rees
2002-02-25 9:32 ` Ian Castle
2002-02-25 9:52 ` Markus Schaber
2002-02-25 8:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-23 5:50 ` Richard Gooch
2002-02-23 5:40 ` hugang
2002-02-23 5:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 9:25 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-02-23 13:55 ` gmack
2002-02-23 15:43 ` bert hubert [this message]
2002-02-25 0:07 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-02-25 0:32 ` ANN: syscalltrack v0.7 released guy keren
2002-02-25 7:48 ` gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4 Jakub Jelinek
2002-02-25 9:46 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-02-25 9:59 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-02-25 12:55 ` Jan Hubicka
2002-02-25 16:08 ` Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020223164353.B1952@outpost.ds9a.nl \
--to=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pgallen@randomlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®