From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 16:22:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 16:22:10 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:33673 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 16:22:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 13:19:41 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020301.131941.57275237.davem@redhat.com> To: greearb@candelatech.com Cc: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, zab@zabbo.net Subject: Re: Various 802.1Q VLAN driver patches. [try2] From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3C7FF04D.1090202@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: <20020301213458.A30120@devcon.net> <3C7FE9B4.441B553@mandrakesoft.com> <3C7FF04D.1090202@candelatech.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Greear Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 14:19:09 -0700 The subtle difference is that we want to be able to have an MTU 4 bytes bigger than the VLAN device's MTU, but we most likely do NOT want the rest of the stack to know we are using the higher MTU Jeff understands this Ben :-)