On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:20:25PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:

> 1 - didn't try, I checked that the patch had not been reverted, and
>     assumed that if it was broken and not changed it was broken still.
>     And I only looked in pre2-ac2, if it was fixed and Alan patched it
>     back broken.

Well, try it.  The correct patch is in there.

> 2 - understanding vast stretches of uncommented code you may need to
>     change is worthwhile reading. The corolary is that comments are worthwhile
>     typing.

(You must have missed the ChangeLog.)

Tim.
*/