From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:59:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:59:44 -0500 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:64262 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:59:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 08:59:57 -0700 From: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones Subject: Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers Message-ID: <20020306085957.A9147@hq.fsmlabs.com> In-Reply-To: <20020305165233.A28212@fireball.zosima.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <3C8543CC.A6017F76@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20020306111745.G6531@suse.de> <20020306144849.GB28744@stingr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20020306144849.GB28744@stingr.net>; from i@stingr.net on Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 05:48:49PM +0300 Organization: FSM Labs Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 05:48:49PM +0300, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: > Replying to Dave Jones: > > Something I've not yet worked out is why none of the proponents of > > arch, subversion etc are offering to run a mirror of Linus' > > bitkeeper tree for those who don't want to use bk, but > > "must have 0-day kernels". > > Because they do not want bitkeeper, and do not know how to bk pull & export > WITHOUT bk itself :) Really, that's too stupid for words. Let them first figure out how to keep the data from passing through any proprietary routers in the Internet. The real answer is that they can't do it. -- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com