From: Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>
To: Jean-Eric Cuendet <jean-eric.cuendet@linkvest.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UNIX bench better on 2.2 than 2.4?
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 05:32:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020315053211.A5619@mark.mielke.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C91A822.7030304@linkvest.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C91A822.7030304@linkvest.com>; from jean-eric.cuendet@linkvest.com on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:52:02AM +0100
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:52:02AM +0100, Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:
> Results:
> Host1: 2xPIII 550MHz / 1Gb RAM / RAID5 SCSI / 2.4.6smp + LVM
> Result: 164.7
> Host2: 2xPIII 866MHz / 1Gb RAM / RAID1 soft IDE / 2.4.16smp + LVM
> Result: 195.7
> Host3: 1xPIII 800MHz / 512Mb RAM / IDE / 2.2.19 RedHat 6.2
> Result: 208.6
> Host4: 1xPIII 600MHz / 256Mb RAM / IDE / 2.4.19-pre2-ac4-preempt
> Result: 153.6
I dunno what Unix bench is... but isn't 153.6/208.6 close to 600/800
in terms of a fraction?
It isn't really fair to compare different machine configurations with
different OS's, and declare that the OS is the only factor involved.
Make Host3 or Host4 have both versions of the linux kernel in /boot
and try each on the same machine.
mark
--
mark@mielke.cc/markm@ncf.ca/markm@nortelnetworks.com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-15 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-15 7:52 Jean-Eric Cuendet
2002-03-15 10:32 ` Mark Mielke [this message]
2002-03-15 10:44 ` Jean-Eric Cuendet
2002-03-15 10:56 ` Mark Mielke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-15 7:36 Jean-Eric Cuendet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020315053211.A5619@mark.mielke.cc \
--to=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
--cc=jean-eric.cuendet@linkvest.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®