From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S312924AbSDBUwh>; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:52:37 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S312925AbSDBUw1>; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:52:27 -0500
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:8676 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S312924AbSDBUwP>;
	Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:52:15 -0500
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 12:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20020402.124627.97201108.davem@redhat.com>
To: greearb@candelatech.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RH 7.2.99 SkipJack kernel (2.4.18-XX) oops.
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <3CAA184C.6020105@candelatech.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

   From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
   Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 13:45:00 -0700

   I have not seen this in the non-redhat kernels, but that
   may be for other reasons.  I did open a bug with RH as well.
   
Looks like a Tulip problem of some sort.