mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <christian.schoenebeck@epost.de>,
	"Trever L. Adams" <tadams-lists@myrealbox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: power off (again)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 11:52:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020419230335.6454C755@merlin.webofficenow.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020418201220.C6D6247B1@debian.heim.lan> <1019163766.6743.8.camel@aurora> <20020419123026.A802D47B4@debian.heim.lan>

On Friday 19 April 2002 08:58 am, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 23:02 schrieb Trever L. Adams:
> > Just out of curiosity, have you changed your power off scripts to
> > reflect: "halt -p".
>
> Yes, this is not the problem

Just thought I'd give a "me too" response.  The Red Hat 7.2 kernel powers 
down all three systems I've tried it on (a Dell Inspiron 3500 laptop, a 
Toshiba Tecra 8000, and an SIS chipset motherboard).  The 2.4.18 and 2.4.17 
kernels do NOT power down any of those systems (It will spins down the hard 
drive instead, but the system power stays on.  Yes, I'm compiling in the 
right APM support.  I've tried it both with and without the "use APM bios to 
power down" switch.)

The only difference between boots is the kernel.  Haven't had time to really 
look into it, but a quick check of the code didn't reveal any obviously 
cuplable differences between the apm power down functions under the arch 
directory.  It seems like something else in the system state is getting 
twiddled that turns a turn-the-machine-off request into a "reduce power but 
stay on" request that just spins down the hard drive...

Dunno.

Rob


  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-19 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-18 20:40 Christian Schoenebeck
2002-04-18 21:02 ` Trever L. Adams
2002-04-19 12:58   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2002-04-19 15:52     ` Rob Landley [this message]
2002-04-20 13:06       ` Christian Schoenebeck
2002-04-20 13:35         ` Rob Landley
2002-04-22  5:39       ` Akkana
2002-04-20 14:24   ` Thunder from the hill
2002-04-20 13:45     ` Rob Landley
2002-04-20 22:46       ` Trever L. Adams
2002-04-20 23:24         ` Thunder from the hill
2002-04-21  4:47           ` Rob Landley
     [not found] ` <20020419045648.GA2104@top.worldcontrol.com>
2002-04-19 12:56   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2002-04-19 16:07     ` Rob Landley
     [not found] ` <1019162789.3361.0.camel@cristal>
2002-04-19 13:05   ` Christian Schoenebeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020419230335.6454C755@merlin.webofficenow.com \
    --to=landley@trommello.org \
    --cc=christian.schoenebeck@epost.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tadams-lists@myrealbox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®