[patch] Re: gdb stopped working in 2.5.10 - works fine in 2.4.x

[Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:57:36PM +0200, Jurriaan on Alpha wrote:
> the breakpoint with a negative number, followed by the message 'Cannot
> access memory at ...' happens on any executable I try with gdb.
> 
> This didn't happen with the 2.4.x kernels, so I suspect something in
> 2.5.x. Any ideas?

Yes, gdb and strace are broken since 2.5.6, IIRC.
Some necessary 'thread_info' changes still are missing in ptrace.c.
Fix appended. 

Ivan.

--- 2.5.9/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c	Sun Apr 14 23:18:55 2002
+++ linux/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c	Mon Apr 15 18:36:43 2002
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ get_reg_addr(struct task_struct * task, 
 		zero = 0;
 		addr = &zero;
 	} else {
-		addr = (long *)((long)task + regoff[regno]);
+		addr = (long *)((long)task->thread_info + regoff[regno]);
 	}
 	return addr;
 }
@@ -340,9 +340,9 @@ sys_ptrace(long request, long pid, long 
 		if ((unsigned long) data > _NSIG)
 			goto out;
 		if (request == PTRACE_SYSCALL)
-			set_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
+			set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
 		else
-			clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
+			clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
 		child->exit_code = data;
 		wake_up_process(child);
 		/* make sure single-step breakpoint is gone. */
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ sys_ptrace(long request, long pid, long 
 			goto out;
 		/* Mark single stepping.  */
 		child->thread_info->bpt_nsaved = -1;
-		clear_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
+		clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
 		wake_up_process(child);
 		child->exit_code = data;
 		/* give it a chance to run. */