From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 09:26:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 09:26:21 -0400 Received: from kahuna.kalkatraz.de ([62.145.25.91]:2688 "EHLO golem.home.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 09:26:21 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 15:26:02 +0200 From: Lars Weitze To: Jeremy Zawodny Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 100 Mbit on slow machine Message-Id: <20020428152602.083e3b06.cd@kalkatraz.de> In-Reply-To: <20020427221905.GA10112@thinkpad0.zawodny.com> Organization: http://www.liquidsteel.net X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: "Add'HrsHhg}pA?6>_fl]8[PNFwpJTSTW?I_:}%1O}rQof)E5W:qQbr1i>J?[?W:9"~?}]; ,?}|UTr8Ww=d%HY}-ap:|nv& wrote: > Have you verified that the duplex settings are correct? I've had > problems on more than one occasion with mismatched duplex on 100Mbit > cards (and switches). Know the problem. It's running full duplex, but there is an other server an the same switch with the same network card making none of these problems. Anyway. I've put a 10 Mbit board into it now and moved the big harddisk to another PC. Regards CD -- "Ihre Meinung ist mir zwar widerlich, aber ich werde mich dafuer totschlagen lassen, dass sie sie sagen duerfen." Voltaire PGP-Key: http://cd.kalkatraz.de PGP fingerprint: 4950 8576 778F DEDF 85D1 C04D 586F 2C45 E714 E13A