From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 May 2002 05:24:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 May 2002 05:24:15 -0400 Received: from imladris.infradead.org ([194.205.184.45]:5892 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 May 2002 05:24:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 10:23:28 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: William Lee Irwin III , Patricia Gaughen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] discontigmem support for ia32 NUMA box against 2.4.19pre7 Message-ID: <20020501102328.B1238@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , William Lee Irwin III , Patricia Gaughen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200204300115.g3U1FQc16634@w-gaughen.des.beaverton.ibm.com> <20020430072654.B2262@infradead.org> <20020501012213.GA32767@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:22:13PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > Umm, NUMA without SMP looks rather strange to me.. > > It's still fully possible, though I'm not clear on whether NUMA-Q > supports it. It doesn't really make sense :) Still I think it makes sense to have CONFIG_NUMAQ or whatever to depend on CONFIG_SMP