From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 May 2002 04:22:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 May 2002 04:21:05 -0400 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:24723 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 May 2002 04:20:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 00:57:44 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cox Cc: Kai Germaschewski , Keith Owens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel Message-ID: <20020502225743.GC22246@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > possible that the ABI does not change but the checksum does. That happens > > a lot, but it's not really a big problem because that (if done right) will > > just cause spurious rebuilds - correctness isn't affected. > > ccache is your friend on that one. > > > Of course, for people who are patching their kernels a lot, modversions > > (again if done right) are a pain in the a**, since they cause a lot of not > > really necessary rebuilds. But people who do that supposedly think they > > ccache is still your friend 8) What is ccache? Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa