From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 14:47:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 14:47:35 -0400 Received: from c9mailgw02.amadis.com ([216.163.188.200]:20751 "EHLO C9Mailgw04.amadis.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 14:47:34 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Robert Baruch Subject: Fwd: Re: NDA used for drivers/usb/storage/shuttle_usbat.c? Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 14:43:16 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] To: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net, Linux Kernel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200205041443.16772.autophile@starband.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: NDA used for drivers/usb/storage/shuttle_usbat.c? Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 14:40:59 -0400 From: Robert Baruch To: Adrian Bunk This sounds as if it might be that this open source driver violates the > NDA you signed. Could you please clarify in the comment in this file that > this driver doesn't violate the NDA? Adrian, In personal communication with the representative of the NDA for SCM, I have been assured that an open-source driver would not violate the NDA. I can update the comment to this effect. --Rob -------------------------------------------------------