From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 07:26:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 07:26:23 -0400 Received: from noose.gt.owl.de ([62.52.19.4]:39185 "HELO noose.gt.owl.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 07:26:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 13:25:38 +0200 From: Florian Lohoff To: "David S. Miller" Cc: ivan@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc64 cleanup cyclades.c Message-ID: <20020505112538.GA534@paradigm.rfc822.org> In-Reply-To: <20020504162518.GA7785@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20020505.001158.128654145.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organization: rfc822 - pure communication Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:11:58AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > This looks suspicious, did you really need it? Not explicetly - Drop that - It was just a consistency issue. Flo --=20 Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Heisenberg may have been here. --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE81RayUaz2rXW+gJcRAsoBAKClSH8aFNcOJ/EYsWtqLYd0jSTk8wCfTgry Mb0oaAfxd7H9cjPY4b6XuZk= =fYzM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--