From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:41:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:41:03 -0400 Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.14.212]:7601 "EHLO winder.codepoet.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:41:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:41:01 -0600 From: Erik Andersen To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linux Kernel , "Andre M. Hedrick" , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE TCQ for 2.4.19-pre8 Message-ID: <20020506174101.GB24013@codepoet.org> Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org Mail-Followup-To: Erik Andersen , Jens Axboe , Linux Kernel , "Andre M. Hedrick" , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020506134535.GC18817@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18-rmk5, Rebel-NetWinder(Intel StrongARM 110 rev 3), 185.95 BogoMips X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon May 06, 2002 at 03:45:35PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > People who were (rightfully so) afraid to test 2.5 can now play with ide > tagged queueing in 2.4. Works great here. What sort of behavior changes should I expect to see? Faster? Less CPU utilization? Are there limited set of controllers and/ or drives on which this works? -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--