From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S315261AbSEFXgV>; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:36:21 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S315262AbSEFXgU>; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:36:20 -0400
Received: from samba.sourceforge.net ([198.186.203.85]:995 "HELO
	lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S315261AbSEFXgU>;
	Mon, 6 May 2002 19:36:20 -0400
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:35:44 +1000
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Andy Carlson <naclos@andyc.dyndns.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)
Message-ID: <20020506233544.GA21495@krispykreme>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205061608300.26867-100000@mustard.heime.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205061106050.2878-100000@ancyc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

 
> Do the userspace tools still depend on Redhat or a derivative?  If this 
> is true, I would say that Tux should stay out of the kernel.  It is 
> aggravating when you want to try something new, and run into 
> dependencies on specific distros.

No, I use tux on a ppc64 debian machine. It took 30 seconds of adapting the
tux rc file.

Anton