From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 20:18:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 20:18:26 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:61602 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 20:18:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 17:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020507.170621.93600738.davem@redhat.com> To: colin@gibbs.dhs.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bug in fork failure path? From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1019178622.25887.630.camel@monolith> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Colin Gibbs Date: 18 Apr 2002 20:10:22 -0500 Can we move the init_new_context to just after the mm_init call? Works nicely on sparc. Most archs have a fairly trivial init_new_context anyway. I've put this fix into my trees to make sure it doesn't get lost. Thanks for spotting it.