From: Samuel Maftoul <maftoul@esrf.fr>
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout (2.4.19-pre2/8)
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:06:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020507170621.A3155@pcmaftoul.esrf.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205071454270.16371-100000@dunlop.admin.ie.alphyra.com> <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020507104428.7036A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:53:16AM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Paul Jakma wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > i have a problem with a Dell poweredge with onboard Intel eepro NICs.
> >
> > The network card basically doesnt work. The system logs are filled
> > with:
> [SNIPPED...]
>
>
>
> > looking at the code concerned:
> >
> > static inline void wait_for_cmd_done(long cmd_ioaddr)
> > {
> > int wait = 1000;
> > do udelay(1) ;
> > while(inb(cmd_ioaddr) && --wait >= 0);
> > #ifndef final_version
> > if (wait < 0)
> > printk(KERN_ALERT "eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout!\n");
> > #endif
> > }
> >
>
> This procedure is called from numerous places in the code.
> In line 1069 of eepro100.c, comment out the call to wait_for_cmd_done().
> See if this fixes it. If it does, look in the header and send a patch
> to the current maintainer. FYI, I use this driver with no problems
> on 2.4.18 -- but I have commented-out that call because there, in fact,
> might be no command to wait for and I got spurious messages.
>
> Cheers,
> Dick Johnson
>
> Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
>
> Windows-2000/Professional isn't.
I have the same message but only when I'm using my ieee-1394 devices (
firewire ) .
I copy from NFS to ieee-1394 HD and approximatively at 256 meg of copied
data from network I have the message (wait_for_cmd_timeout), and I'm not
able use the network, nor the mounted HD.
I need to say the system is running 2.4.18 SMP ( 2 proc ) with 2go of
RAM (higmeme 4-GB from suse ) ( It's a scientific data analysis and extraction system ).
What should I do ?
Should I remove the code you told me to remove ?
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-07 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-07 14:23 Paul Jakma
2002-05-07 14:53 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-05-07 15:06 ` Samuel Maftoul [this message]
2002-05-07 15:44 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-05-07 20:20 ` Paul Jakma
2002-05-08 3:22 ` Paul Jakma
2002-05-07 15:12 ` Mickael Bailly
2002-05-07 15:26 ` Samuel Maftoul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020507170621.A3155@pcmaftoul.esrf.fr \
--to=maftoul@esrf.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®