mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Maftoul <maftoul@esrf.fr>
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout (2.4.19-pre2/8)
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:06:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020507170621.A3155@pcmaftoul.esrf.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205071454270.16371-100000@dunlop.admin.ie.alphyra.com> <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020507104428.7036A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>

On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:53:16AM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Paul Jakma wrote:
> 
> > hi,
> > 
> > i have a problem with a Dell poweredge with onboard Intel eepro NICs.
> > 
> > The network card basically doesnt work. The system logs are filled 
> > with:
> [SNIPPED...]
> 
> 
> 
> > looking at the code concerned:
> > 
> > static inline void wait_for_cmd_done(long cmd_ioaddr)
> > {
> >         int wait = 1000;
> >         do  udelay(1) ;
> >         while(inb(cmd_ioaddr) && --wait >= 0);
> > #ifndef final_version
> >         if (wait < 0)
> >                 printk(KERN_ALERT "eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout!\n");
> > #endif
> > }
> > 
> 
> This procedure is called from numerous places in the code.
> In line 1069 of eepro100.c, comment out the call to wait_for_cmd_done().
> See if this fixes it. If it does, look in the header and send a patch
> to the current maintainer. FYI, I use this driver with no problems
> on 2.4.18 -- but I have commented-out that call because there, in fact,
> might be no command to wait for and I got spurious messages.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dick Johnson
> 
> Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
> 
>                  Windows-2000/Professional isn't.
I have the same message but only when I'm using my ieee-1394 devices (
firewire ) .
I copy from NFS to ieee-1394 HD and approximatively at 256 meg of copied
data from network I have the message (wait_for_cmd_timeout), and I'm not
able use the network, nor the mounted HD.

I need to say the system is running 2.4.18 SMP ( 2 proc ) with 2go of
RAM (higmeme 4-GB from suse ) ( It's a scientific data analysis and extraction system ).

What should I do ? 
Should I remove the code you told me to remove ?
        Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-07 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-07 14:23 Paul Jakma
2002-05-07 14:53 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-05-07 15:06   ` Samuel Maftoul [this message]
2002-05-07 15:44     ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-05-07 20:20       ` Paul Jakma
2002-05-08  3:22   ` Paul Jakma
2002-05-07 15:12 ` Mickael Bailly
2002-05-07 15:26   ` Samuel Maftoul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020507170621.A3155@pcmaftoul.esrf.fr \
    --to=maftoul@esrf.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®