From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:38:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:38:34 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:17428 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:38:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:38:57 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Alan Cox Cc: Andy Carlson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?) Message-ID: <20020507173857.R31998@dualathlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20020507170331.P31998@dualathlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 04:26:02PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > which Linus rejected because they put TuX specific code in places like > the dcache where from a pure clean kernel point of view it is not a good example, that is been cleanedup in latest tux releases, there's no tux specific code anymore in the dcache: ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.19pre8aa2/60_tux-vfs-5 there are still a a few lines of tux in the task struct and the socks but it doesn't really matter to the non tux users, and it obviously cannot affect stability in any way. Andrea