From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 18:04:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 18:04:00 -0400 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:42947 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 18:03:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 16:03:50 -0600 Message-Id: <200205072203.g47M3o002102@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Patrick Mochel Cc: Thunder from the hill , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.14 IDE 56 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patrick Mochel writes: > > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Thunder from the hill wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > /driverfs/root/pci0/00:1f.4/usb_bus/000/ > > > /driverfs/class/ide/ > > > /driverfs/root/pci0/07.2/ > > > /driverfs/class/ide/0/ > > > /driverfs/class/ide/0/2 > > > > Why not fixing devfs for that? My root directory is messed up enough. We > > have dev, proc, tmp, ... > > For one, I am of the camp that believes devfs is unfixable. But it's not actually broken, now that the locking is fixed. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca