From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 20:25:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 20:25:15 -0400 Received: from mailhost.tue.nl ([131.155.2.5]:51639 "EHLO mailhost.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 20:25:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 02:25:13 +0200 From: Guest section DW To: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.14 IDE 56 Message-ID: <20020508002513.GA26150@win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020507153451.02381ec0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <20020507162010.GA13032@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu> <3CD7F212.5090608@evision-ventures.com> <20020507213603.GA18535@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 05:36:03PM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 05:26:10PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > Uz.ytkownik Jan Harkes napisa?: > > >I'm still hoping a patch will show up that will allow me to regain > > >access to my compactflash cards and IBM microdrive disks. The code > > >currently doesn't rescan for new drives when a card has been inserted, > > >although it still seems to have all the necessary logic. > > > > Yes I'm fully aware of this, but the whole initialization > > is currently much in flux and I will return to this issue back > > if I think that things are in shape there. OK? > > I thought so, you already indicated so around the time that it broke. > There is still a 2.4 kernel when I really need to get to the data. I usually do blockdev --rereadpt /dev/sde or so. That still works for me with 2.5.13. Andries