From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 06:59:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 06:59:25 -0400 Received: from [62.245.135.174] ([62.245.135.174]:51372 "EHLO mail.teraport.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 8 May 2002 06:59:24 -0400 From: "Martin.Knoblauch" Reply-To: Martin.Knoblauch@teraport.de Organization: TeraPort GmbH To: rml@tech9.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 12:59:17 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200205081259.17948.Martin.Knoblauch@teraport.de> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 05/08/2002 12:59:17 PM, Serialize by Router on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 05/08/2002 12:59:24 PM, Serialize complete at 05/08/2002 12:59:24 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The preempt-kernel patch for 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 is now available at What about lock-break for the -ac series? Or does this conflict with rmap and/or O(1)? Martin -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759