From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 01:51:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 01:51:02 -0400 Received: from samba.sourceforge.net ([198.186.203.85]:62860 "HELO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 01:51:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:46:55 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Ken Brownfield Cc: Dan Kegel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "yossi@ixiacom.com" Subject: Re: khttpd newbie problem Message-ID: <20020509054655.GB10468@krispykreme> In-Reply-To: <3CD402D2.E3A94CA2@kegel.com> <20020505005439.GA12430@krispykreme> <3CD4C93D.E543B188@kegel.com> <20020508222119.A12672@asooo.flowerfire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > khttpd is very much production quality on IA32, and has been since > 2.4.0-test1. TUX2 is not, however, since under load it enters a 99% CPU > busy loop. You may not have enough load to cause TUX2 to do this, and > TUX1 may not have this problem. Tux2 has been stable for me on very large specweb runs. Ingo has been able to fix all the bugs I couldnt - a detailed bug report here would be helpful. Anton