From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 06:09:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 06:09:38 -0400 Received: from imladris.infradead.org ([194.205.184.45]:27663 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 06:09:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 11:09:25 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "David S. Miller" Cc: dank@kegel.com, arjanv@redhat.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, khttpd-users@alt.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: khttpd rotten? Message-ID: <20020509110925.A10839@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , dank@kegel.com, arjanv@redhat.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, khttpd-users@alt.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020505.191422.11638807.davem@redhat.com> <3CD5ECEE.E6C0B894@kegel.com> <20020506112259.A25629@infradead.org> <20020509.024912.14048739.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:49:12AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > have little time to fix it. I say pull it from > > 2.4.19-pre9. Marcello, put it out of its misery asap, please... > > it'd time for khttpd to become a standalone patch again. > > Okay, what about the following: > > Are you willing to start being the khttp maintainer? > > I have not seen updates or any attempts at maintaining the > thing in about 2 years. Basically, since it went into the > tree. > > If we aren't changing that situation, we are not removing > the impetus for taking khttpd out of the tree entirely. If khttpd is out-of-tree I volunteer for collecting patches if that is enough for the maintainer status. But I have to admit that I don't really care for it..