From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:16:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:16:05 -0400 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:43669 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:16:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 13:58:21 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Richard Gooch , Alan Cox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, Padraig Brady , Anton Altaparmakov , Martin Dalecki , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.14 IDE 56 Message-ID: <20020509135821.C37@toy.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <200205071840.g47Ie1m32403@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Also, you obviously haven't thought it through AT ALL. Hint: partitions. > > If you have /dev/hda1, that _cannot_ be a symlink to the physical tree, > because on a physical level that partition DOES NOT EXIST. It's purely a > virtual mapping. I don't see why partitions in devicefs are bad idea. Some physical chips show as multiple devices in devicefs, so I'd guess it would be okay for partitions to be there, too. Pavel -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.