From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
To: hch@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br
Subject: 2.4.19-pre7+ I/O-APIC inconsistency
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 13:47:57 +0200 (MET DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200205111147.NAA07199@harpo.it.uu.se> (raw)
2.4.19-pre7 changed the behaviour of CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC due
to the following patch
--- linux-2.4.19-pre6/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c Mon Apr 15 21:53:25 2002
+++ linux-2.4.19-pre7/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c Mon Apr 15 21:54:19 2002
@@ -191,15 +191,27 @@
#define MAX_PIRQS 8
int pirq_entries [MAX_PIRQS];
int pirqs_enabled;
-int skip_ioapic_setup;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC
+int skip_ioapic_setup=1;
+#else
+int skip_ioapic_setup=0;
+#endif
which patch-2.4.19.log seems to attribute to <hch@infradead.org>.
This causes CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC to no longer attempt to use the
I/O-APIC like it used to: now you also have to append an "apic"
command-line option to the kernel. Not only is this a break from
previous behaviour and the documentation (Configure.help), but
it's also inconsistent with SMP, since an SMP kernel _will_ try
to use the I/O-APIC without any additional hackery needed.
(I just helped some high-speed Linux routing colleagues over here
debug a problem with their new dual P4 Xeon E7500 chipset boxes.
SMP kernels worked, but they couldn't figure out why UP_IOAPIC
kernels wouldn't detect and use the I/O-APIC. The patch above was
the culprit.)
Unless this change is absolutely necessary (note that the "noapic"
command line option is still functional for those that need it), I
suggest applying the patch below to restore the previous behaviour.
/Mikael
--- linux-2.4.19-pre8/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c.~1~ Sat May 11 12:30:26 2002
+++ linux-2.4.19-pre8/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c Sat May 11 12:37:06 2002
@@ -191,11 +191,7 @@
#define MAX_PIRQS 8
int pirq_entries [MAX_PIRQS];
int pirqs_enabled;
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC
-int skip_ioapic_setup=1;
-#else
-int skip_ioapic_setup=0;
-#endif
+int skip_ioapic_setup;
static int __init noioapic_setup(char *str)
{
reply other threads:[~2002-05-11 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200205111147.NAA07199@harpo.it.uu.se \
--to=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®