From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 10:58:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 10:58:03 -0400 Received: from smtp2.libero.it ([193.70.192.52]:28889 "EHLO smtp2.libero.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sun, 12 May 2002 10:58:02 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Johnny Mnemonic To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Changelogs on kernel.org Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 12:05:14 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <20020512010709.7a973fac.spyro@armlinux.org> <20020512010959.GH3855@higherplane.net> <1021179952.28117.4.camel@zaphod.graze.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20020512145802Z313578-22651+30503@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 12 May 2002 07:05, Brian C. Huffman wrote: > Generally the defense that "no one else is saying anything" is not a > good one - especially b/c it opens up a huge space for others to agree > with the original argument. And yes, they are illegible. > I agree. If developers need that changelog style it's fine, but on kernel.org homepage there should the old changelog format, so everyone can read it. The best changelog i've ever seen is the one used around ~2.4.9 release - changedescription (author) Regards -- Johnny