From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 18:37:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 18:37:15 -0400 Received: from web20109.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.46]:61967 "HELO web20109.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 18:37:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20020512223710.41173.qmail@web20109.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 15:37:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Jennifer Huang Subject: Question about cpu time accuracy. To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I have a question about cpu time accuracy. I am using kernel 2.4.18. But, when I tried "utime" and "nanosleep" to get a process suspended, it only worked in 10ms granularity, and it's no way to sleep for 1 microsecond. Anyone can help me out of this? Thanks in advance, -Jenny __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com