Re: [OT] Unofficial but Supported Kernel Patches

[Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>]

> [Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>, May-12 2002, Sun, 16:32 -0700]
> On Sun, 12 May 2002, Pawel Kot wrote:
> 
> | On Sun, 12 May 2002, John Weber wrote:
> |
> | > I am trying to put a list together of all the unofficial kernel patches.
> | >   I am speaking of systems like Rik's RMAP VM, and others like it.
> | >
> | > I want to put up a page on linuxhq.com with all of these patches.  If
> | > you would like to have your maintained patches (or trees) listed, please
> | > shoot me an email with a description of your tree (or patch) and what is
> | > so special about it :).  Also include URLs, emails, or anything else
> | > you'd like published.
> |
> | What about http://kernelnewbies.org/patches/ ?
> 
> That's nice.
> 
> What I would like is for someone to maintain a set of
> "required" patches to each new kernel --
> "required" here meaning "these patches are needed for kernel
> x.y.z to build or boot cleanly."
> 
> The patchsets would contain only compile/link fixes and
> critical logic fixes to release and pre-release kernels.

Do you mean something even more
"select fault_and_patch from kernel group by release;" than
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/Linux-2.5.html
?

T.