From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 05:07:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 05:07:07 -0400 Received: from 12-224-36-73.client.attbi.com ([12.224.36.73]:18 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 05:07:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 01:06:22 -0700 From: Greg KH To: jw schultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Changelogs on kernel.org Message-ID: <20020513080621.GD8838@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20020512010709.7a973fac.spyro@armlinux.org> <20020513015724.I14698@pegasys.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.20 (i586) Reply-By: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 06:32:49 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:57:24AM -0700, jw schultz wrote: > > Rather than sort by author i, and i suspect others, would > prefer the top-level sort be by subsystem or a recognizable > aspect (ext2fs, VM, sched, cleanup, etc). That way we could > quickly scan for the patches that relate to areas of > interest. I am aware that currently many patches aren't > even labled suitably but if we start doing this then > eventually it will get better. Some of us already state what subsystem/driver the changeset is for on the first line of the change entry for this very reason :) greg k-h