From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 09:42:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 09:42:36 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:23050 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 09:42:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 14:42:29 +0100 From: Russell King To: Tomas Szepe Cc: "Dave Gilbert (Home)" , Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Changelogs on kernel.org Message-ID: <20020513144229.E6024@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20020512145802Z313578-22651+30503@vger.kernel.org> <20020513115800.GC4258@louise.pinerecords.com> <3CDFB41A.6070701@treblig.org> <20020513140158.B6024@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20020513132734.GA5134@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:27:34PM +0200, Tomas Szepe wrote: > How's this for another try? (logwidth = 38, adjustable per taste) > Myself I'd say this is crap and a nice 140-char xterm will do much > better (you're going to see "long" lines anyway, look at the NTFS > entry below). heh. I agree with the first bit of your second line there 8) However, Marcus Alanen has posted something (in "original mode") that looks a lot nicer. In fact, its quite close to my release note formatting, see: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-announce/2002-April/000186.html -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html