From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 03:21:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 03:21:37 -0400 Received: from imladris.infradead.org ([194.205.184.45]:64525 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 03:21:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:21:30 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andrew Morton Cc: Peter Chubb , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, axboe@suse.de, martin@dalecki.de, neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove 2TB block device limit Message-ID: <20020514082130.A15907@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Peter Chubb , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, axboe@suse.de, martin@dalecki.de, neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au In-Reply-To: <20020513131339.A4610@infradead.org> <15584.23204.925373.44968@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au> <3CE071F7.347C78B5@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:09:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I think Christoph's point is that a pagecache index is not a sector > number. We agree that we need to plan for taking it to 64 bits, but > it should be something different. Like pageindex_t, or whatever. I don't think we want to increase it. First it grow struct page by 32bits and second 64bit arithmetic on 32bit plattforms is still very expensive. I'd rather see PAGE_CACHE_SIZE growing to address the issues.