From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 09:43:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 09:43:14 -0400 Received: from c16598.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.243.217]:21685 "HELO pc.kolivas.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 09:43:12 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Con Kolivas Reply-To: conman@kolivas.net To: dmarkh@cfl.rr.com Subject: Re: Combined low latency & performance patches for 2.4.18 Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 23:42:52 +1000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] In-Reply-To: <20020429142443.A62481333@pc.kolivas.net> <20020430230105.D5CA01A0AA@pc.kolivas.net> <3CCFA3BD.664EE747@cfl.rr.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200205142343.10555.conman@kolivas.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark (and lkml readers) On further testing from the feedback I've gotten it seems that this patch works fine for gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3.0.3+ There is definitely a problem with trying to compile it with gcc2.96 Cheers, Con Kolivas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE84RRfF6dfvkL3i1gRAmy0AJ91EYI+juz0W92oQzZsRLkgg1ggTwCfT+EY G/aXt+YD49+3mh2UIDIOlyo= =bb9b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----