From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 10:30:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 10:30:03 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:16285 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 10:29:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 07:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020517.071633.67125480.davem@redhat.com> To: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com Cc: ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, andrew.grover@intel.com, mochel@osdl.org, Greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pci segments/domains From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3CE512A7.70202@mandrakesoft.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Garzik Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:24:39 -0400 I know -- that's what I mean by being more explicit. sysdata would become a pointer to struct pci_domain. No thanks, I want to say what the layout is for this object. What pci_domain will end up doing is making for one more dereference to "arch private" state and that stinks for performance :-) Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com