From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 May 2002 23:31:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 May 2002 23:31:03 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([212.71.160.16]:15621 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 May 2002 23:31:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 05:30:56 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Message-ID: <20020517033056.GB4595@louise.pinerecords.com> In-Reply-To: <3038.1021588938@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-OS: Linux/sparc 2.2.21-rc4-ext3-0.0.7a SMP (up 20:37) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Third and final attempt. Original sent on May 2, second mail sent on > > May 14, still no response from Linus. > > Linus is a bastard. Did you forget? This is getting ridiculous all right. Linus, what makes you ignore Keith's work? Would you tend to think he's worked on kbuild25 this long to end up having to send a linus-dammit-would-you-have- -a-look-at-last-i'm-not-going-to-keep-asking-forever msg? Sorry for a slightly offensive post; I can't stand to see such impoliteness. T.