From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:01:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:01:22 -0400 Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es ([163.117.136.122]:8716 "HELO smtp.uc3m.es") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:01:21 -0400 From: "Peter T. Breuer" Message-Id: <200205170701.g4H71CB25476@oboe.it.uc3m.es> Subject: Re: Kernel deadlock using nbd over acenic driver. In-Reply-To: <200205161635.RAA26824@gw.chygwyn.com> from Steven Whitehouse at "May 16, 2002 05:35:43 pm" To: Steve Whitehouse Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:01:12 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: ptb@it.uc3m.es, Oliver Xymoron , chen xiangping , "'Jes Sorensen'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Anonymously-To: Reply-To: ptb@it.uc3m.es X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Steven Whitehouse wrote:" > Thats effectively what PF_MEMALLOC does. The code in question is in > page_alloc.c:__alloc_pages just before and after the rebalance: label. > The z->pages_min gives a per zone minimum for "other processes" that are > not PF_MEMALLOC, A related question, then ... can one adjust the difference between the ceiling for "normal" processes and PF_MEMALLOC processes, and if so, how? Peter