From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 11:19:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 11:19:49 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([212.71.160.16]:8205 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 11:19:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:19:39 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Message-ID: <20020517151939.GF6613@louise.pinerecords.com> In-Reply-To: <1021619519.5859.7.camel@tiger> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-OS: Linux/sparc 2.2.21-rc4-ext3-0.0.7a SMP (up 1 day, 5:42) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Before I send you the kbuild 2.5 patch, how do you want to handle it? > > > > Why do you not just make a patch the way that makes most sens to you and > > sent it to him. > > I suggested exactly that to Keith. but he, too, apparently decided to > exercise his freedom to ignore me. I can't see any point in sending a patch w/o first negotiating its acceptance. After all, it can be ignored just like anything else that comes in thru TCP port 25. t. -- "when you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all." - god to bender