From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:39:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:39:44 -0400 Received: from jurassic.park.msu.ru ([195.208.223.243]:5386 "EHLO jurassic.park.msu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:39:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:39:03 +0400 From: Ivan Kokshaysky To: "David S. Miller" Cc: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, andrew.grover@intel.com, mochel@osdl.org, Greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pci segments/domains Message-ID: <20020517153903.A24121@jurassic.park.msu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020517144755.A16767@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20020517.034048.34092752.davem@redhat.com> <20020517151154.B16767@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20020517.040421.38226563.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:04:21AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > I'm not saying pci_domain structure will help, I am only > saying that domain number is not the way to figure out > the ability to do DMA between two devices :-) Agreed. What about dma_addr_t pci_to_pci_map_single(struct pci_dev *master, struct pci_dev *target, dma_addr_t tgt_addr, size_t size, int dir) Could be implemented without much pain if there is enough interest. :-) > I know for a fact that you can do PCI-to-PCI DMA between > two PCI domains on Alpha. Ah, indeed. I should check the docs before posting... :-\ Ivan.