From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 13:37:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 13:37:22 -0400 Received: from roc-24-95-199-137.rochester.rr.com ([24.95.199.137]:7407 "EHLO www.kroptech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 13:37:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 13:37:18 -0400 From: Adam Kropelin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Message-ID: <20020517173718.GA184@www.kroptech.com> In-Reply-To: <86256BBC.004F08E1.00@smtpnotes.altec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 09:21:12AM -0500, Wayne.Brown@altec.com wrote: > > > OTOH, those of us who are not looking forward to kbuild 2.5 are grateful for any > delays we can get. ...and what would your beefs (beeves?) with kbuild-2.5 be? I searched the archives for the last 12 months and I don't see anythinng from you relevant to kbuild-2.5. Keith has been addressing concerns quite regularly; I should think if you have constructive comments, he'd surely listen. You *do* have constructive comments, right? --Adam