From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 14:15:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 14:15:49 -0400 Received: from mailhost2.teleline.es ([195.235.113.141]:26721 "EHLO tsmtp6.mail.isp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 14:15:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 20:19:00 +0200 From: Diego Calleja To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Keith Owens , torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Message-Id: <20020517201900.65e90bbc.DiegoCG@teleline.es> In-Reply-To: <3038.1021588938@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 May 2002 08:42:18 +1000 Keith Owens escribió: So we have a good patch that can make life better for developers and users. Not to apply it is a *bad* decision. Linus, soon or later, you'll have to replace the existing kbuild and you know that (it seems you're taking patches about it). You must have some conflict with Keith, but i don't care about it. So, if you have to replace the existing kbuild, why re-do it if it's done yet?. Linus, please tell Keith that he changes kbuild just as you wants, and now. linux is yours, and you've the right to take this kid of decisions. Leaders are for that. And Keith, just try to do kbuild just like Linus wants. We'll help you, too. But please, we're not to be fools and re-do all the work again. kbuild 2.5 _is_ good and all of us know that. So, please, please....don't let me think we're being so idiot.... Diego calleja DiegoCG@teleline.es