From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 16:21:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 16:21:20 -0400 Received: from mailhost2.teleline.es ([195.235.113.141]:26912 "EHLO tsmtp5.mail.isp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 16:21:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 22:25:02 +0200 From: Diego Calleja To: Dave Jones Cc: Wayne.Brown@altec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Message-Id: <20020517222502.7a6ecfe7.DiegoCG@teleline.es> In-Reply-To: <20020517220922.M4712@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 May 2002 22:09:22 +0200 Dave Jones escribió: > Spot the pattern? Exponential growth. not only that, but for the most > part, the build system is the same across all of these. If we continue > growing at the current rate without doing something about the build > process, we're all going to be needing 8-way Opterons with several > GB of memory to get any work done. Well. If a miracle doesn't happen, i'll have to start thinking how to buy a 8-way Opteron.... > > If kbuild2.5 is faster, and produces the same end result (or better > still, more accurate builds), there's no valid reason to ignore it > that I can see. > > Dave. > -- > | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk > | SuSE Labs > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/