From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316562AbSEUIc5>; Tue, 21 May 2002 04:32:57 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316568AbSEUIc4>; Tue, 21 May 2002 04:32:56 -0400
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:31431 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S316562AbSEUIcz>;
	Tue, 21 May 2002 04:32:55 -0400
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 01:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20020521.011858.88884742.davem@redhat.com>
To: beezly@beezly.org.uk
Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOPS: ext3/sparc badness
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020521083004.GB18501@monkey.beezly.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

   From: Andrew Beresford <beezly@beezly.org.uk>
   Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:30:04 +0100
   
   Understood, but the reason I was using 3.0.4 was because sparc64-egcs
   has been suspected of generating some bad code in the md.c (see the link
   in the previous e-mail I sent).

I don't think so... but please repost the link as I've deleted all of
your emails.