From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 May 2002 04:30:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 May 2002 04:30:12 -0400 Received: from 217-79-104-247.adsl.griffin.net.uk ([217.79.104.247]:3112 "EHLO lemur.beezly.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 May 2002 04:30:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:30:04 +0100 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OOPS: ext3/sparc badness Message-ID: <20020521083004.GB18501@monkey.beezly.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1021897921.8474.8.camel@montgomery> <20020520.143018.82222608.davem@redhat.com> <20020520225206.A15153@infradead.org> <20020520.150628.25332319.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Andrew Beresford Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David, On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 03:06:28PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Christoph Hellwig > Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 22:52:06 +0100 > > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 02:30:18PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > Unsupported compiler for sparc64 kernels. Your OOPS report is going > > to be ignored. Understood, but the reason I was using 3.0.4 was because sparc64-egcs has been suspected of generating some bad code in the md.c (see the link in the previous e-mail I sent). > Btw, is gcc 3.1 supported now or only the magic egcs variant? > > gcc-3.1 should work properly, I've used it but I'm hesitant to %100 > bless it just yet. :-) > > I would prefer to receive bug reports only against the sparc64-egcs > compiler still. I will give gcc-3.1 a try. Cheers, Beezly