From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 04:11:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 04:11:23 -0400 Received: from berta.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.182.12]:20996 "HELO kt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 04:11:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 10:11:22 +0200 From: Wolfgang Wegner To: "David S. Miller" Cc: ww@kt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sk_buff misunderstanding? Message-ID: <20020524101122.C1778@bigmac.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> In-Reply-To: <20020524100434.B1778@bigmac.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> <20020524.005259.36212462.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:52:59AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > If you don't copy your new sk_buff members at skb_copy and > skb_clone time, nobody will ever see them. thanks, David... I forgot to mention that I do initialize the values in alloc_skb and skb_headerinit, and copy them in skb_clone and copy_skb_header Are there any more occurrences? Wolfgang