mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: negative dentries wasting ram
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 18:39:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020524163942.GB15703@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0205241215340.9792-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205240927580.11495-100000@home.transmeta.com>

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:29:56AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 24 May 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > However, you're right that it probably doesn't help to do this after
> > > "unlink()" - it's probably only worth doing when actually doing a
> > > "lookup()" that fails.
> >
> > Depends on many things, including the amount of userland code that does
> > 	unlink(name);
> > 	open(name, O_CREAT|O_EXCL..., ...);
> 
> Note that this will have to touch the FS anyway, since the O_CREAT thing
> forces a call down to the FS to actually create the file.

yep. the only case where it could provide some in-core "caching"
positive effect is:

	unlink
	open(w/o creat)

but I don't see it as a common case.

> The only think we save is a dentry kfree/kmalloc in this case, nbot a FS

agreed.

Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-24 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-24  7:16 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24  8:10 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-05-24 15:36   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 16:12     ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 16:21       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 16:24         ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 14:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-24 14:51   ` David S. Miller
2002-05-24 14:53   ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-05-24 20:44     ` David Schwartz
2002-05-25 17:33     ` Florian Weimer
2002-05-24 15:54   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 16:22   ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 16:29     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-24 16:39       ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2002-05-24 17:04         ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 17:06           ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 17:55           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 18:00             ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 18:58               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 19:04                 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 19:43                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 19:55                     ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 20:36                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 22:14                         ` Jan Harkes
2002-05-24 22:31                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-26  8:06             ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-05-24 17:00       ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 18:36         ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-31  8:34 ` Oliver Neukum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020524163942.GB15703@dualathlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®