From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: negative dentries wasting ram
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 18:39:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020524163942.GB15703@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0205241215340.9792-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205240927580.11495-100000@home.transmeta.com>
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:29:56AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 24 May 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > However, you're right that it probably doesn't help to do this after
> > > "unlink()" - it's probably only worth doing when actually doing a
> > > "lookup()" that fails.
> >
> > Depends on many things, including the amount of userland code that does
> > unlink(name);
> > open(name, O_CREAT|O_EXCL..., ...);
>
> Note that this will have to touch the FS anyway, since the O_CREAT thing
> forces a call down to the FS to actually create the file.
yep. the only case where it could provide some in-core "caching"
positive effect is:
unlink
open(w/o creat)
but I don't see it as a common case.
> The only think we save is a dentry kfree/kmalloc in this case, nbot a FS
agreed.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-24 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-24 7:16 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 8:10 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-05-24 15:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 16:12 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 16:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 16:24 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 14:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-24 14:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-24 14:53 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-05-24 20:44 ` David Schwartz
2002-05-25 17:33 ` Florian Weimer
2002-05-24 15:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 16:22 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 16:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-24 16:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2002-05-24 17:04 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 17:06 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 17:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 18:00 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 18:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 19:04 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 19:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 19:55 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 20:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 22:14 ` Jan Harkes
2002-05-24 22:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-26 8:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-05-24 17:00 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-24 18:36 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-31 8:34 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020524163942.GB15703@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®