From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 13:44:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 13:44:15 -0400 Received: from imladris.infradead.org ([194.205.184.45]:11274 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 13:44:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 18:44:02 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Robert Love Cc: Marcus Meissner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Compiling 2.2.19 with -O3 flag Message-ID: <20020524184402.A24780@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Robert Love , Marcus Meissner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200205241645.g4OGjbE30934@ns.caldera.de> <1022259244.2638.243.camel@sinai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Robert Love wrote: > On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 09:45, Marcus Meissner wrote: > > > > Heh, now that is interesting. > > > > Not really, -Os implies -O2, cf gcc/toplev.c: > > Well, according to Alan -Os outperforms -O2. So either the code is > smaller _and_ faster - and that is surely interesting - or the code is > _not_ smaller and -Os is a misnomer. Seems interesting to me. -Os implies -O2 + additional size-reducing features: [hch@sb hch]$ grep -r optimize_size /work/people/hch/gcc/gcc | wc -l 250 [hch@sb hch]$ A bunch of matches are in ChangeLog and most are target-specific, but I guess you got the point..